Ticket #344 (closed task)
Opened 7 years ago
difference between temperature shown by Bios and sensors (Examined/Solved - lm_sensors 2.5.0 I2C 2.5.0 Linux 2.2.15)
| Reported by: | contact | Owned by: | somebody |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | minor | Milestone: | |
| Component: | hardware | Version: | |
| Keywords: | Cc: |
Description
Hello,
okay, this is more a question, but a bug report, but i hope it is okay !
I have compiled lm_sensors into kernel 2.2.15, so i do not have to load modules,
it's easier ;-) But if i use sensors i get about 31-31C for the CPU, after a
certain time of no activity on the machine. If i reboot instantly and go into
the Bios i always see > 40C for the CPU. I can't imagine that the CPU heats up
so much in a few seconds, so why is there such a gap between the value shown by
the Bios and sensors ? Which value is more reliable ?
Thanx in advance !
Malte
AMD-K6 III 400 Mhz AHX version at 2.4V
Asus P5A-B rev. 1.05 Bios 1008 from 19/10/1999
Winbond W83781d chip
Linux 2.2.15
lm_sensors and I2C 2.5.0 compiled into kernel
--- Our package reports the 'real' temperature.
BIOSes often add a 'fudge' factor of 5-10C to account for
the fact that the sensors are a small distance away from the CPU.
If you would like to add a fudge-factor yourself you can do
so inside the configuration file /etc/sensors.conf.
See also our FAQ #4.12.
If you need more information you can follow up by sending
mail to sensors@… and referencing ticket
#333.
MDS 5/29/00
